Sako AIII

Started by sakorick, January 07, 2019, 02:21:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sakorick

The last load I used with my old 7Mag was RL22 but can't find the charge....I think it was 64 grains which pushed a 160 Nosler Partition to around 2950.
Talk to yourself. There are times you need expert advice.

JaDub


gitano

4831- Has a always worked very well for all of the cases based on .338 WM case.

Paul
Be nicer than necessary.

sakorick

Quote from: gitano;1522784831- Has a always worked very well for all of the cases based on .338 WM case.

Paul

As my brother Dave used to say, "4831 works on everything"!
Talk to yourself. There are times you need expert advice.

Jamie.270

Quote from: sakorick;152272The last load I used with my old 7Mag was RL22 but can't find the charge....I think it was 64 grains which pushed a 160 Nosler Partition to around 2950.

Quote from: JaDub;152277IMR 4350.

Quote from: gitano;1522784831- Has a always worked very well for all of the cases based on .338 WM case.

Paul

Quote from: sakorick;152280As my brother Dave used to say, "4831 works on everything"!


 It certainly works in a .270.   :cool:

 Either the H or the IMR version.  :nana:

 


As do all the powders listed above.   :chef:
QuoteRestrictive gun laws that leave good people helpless, don\'t have the power to render bad people harmless.

To believe otherwise is folly. --  Me

gitano

To me, one of the 'coolest' things about black powder is that one TRULY can fill any case with black powder; compress the load; seat a bullet; and fire it without concern of "overloading" the rifle. For .30-06-based cases through .338 Win Mag cases (and maybe even above), you can pretty much do the same with 4831. THAT'S NOT A RECOMMENDATION OR SUGGESTION. (I'm sure some moron could find a way to "break" that 'universal law'.) But for reasonably behaved/mature people, 4831 and "magnum, bottle-necked" cases, 4831 is VERY 'friendly'.

For me personally, 4831 has always given me the best precision handloads with MID-RANGE weight bullets in any case I put it in. In other words, the best precision came with bullets somewhere in the middle of the weight range for the given caliber. It hasn't worked THE BEST for light-for-caliber bullets (except in the 7x300 Weatherby Mag and 115-grain HP), OR for heavy-for-caliber bullets. I have in recent years gotten some satisfaction from other powders like Reloder-17 in the .338 WM using heavier (225) Accubond bullets. I wouldn't even consider using any other powder in the 7mm Rem Mag. Since I've never been able to get Barnes bullets to shoot straight in ANY rifle I own, it's possible that the problem was 4831. I have no interest in 'scientifically' evaluating that possibility.

The above is not a 'sales pitch'. The powder people use in their reloading efforts is of only passing interest (curiosity) to me. I just hate to see people struggle with getting a rifle to shoot straight because they refuse to try "the" powder that A LOT of folks have had success with in that chambering.

Paul
Be nicer than necessary.

Tags: